During the late 1980's and early 1990's, I remember the stories emanating from France of young Muslim schoolgirls expelled for wearing the Hijab.
While many of the young sisters were permitted to return to school wearing the Hijab, wider questions had been raised.
How does a purely secular public school system accommodate religious beliefs? What about the issues of freedom and oppression of women? Were these girls influenced by the “integristes” of Algeria, who were aspiring to implement an Islamic government in the former French colony?
Was this another example of “immigrants” failing to integrate into French society (a favorite theme of le Front National, a national anti-immigrant party)? Was this the beginning of the end of the strict separation between church and state?
At the time, I thought the problem was peculiar to France. Impossible for such an event to happen in Quebec, Canada.
Then on September 10th, 1994, the Muslim community of Quebec (and Canada) received a strong wake-up call.
THE CASE OF EMILIE OUIMET
Emilie Ouimet, a 13-year-old high school student, was sent home from school for wearing the Hijab. The primary reason given by the principal was that the school had a strict code that forbade the use of caps or attire that would distinguish students from their peers – part of a dress code for disciplinary reasons.
Soon after, a debate raged for months through Quebec society.
Incredibly, the issues raised were similar to those raised in France: religious belief in a secular system; the fear of religious fundamentalism; Hijab as a symbol of oppression versus liberation; and integration of “immigrants” into Quebec society (the failure of which was exploited by La Societe St-Jean Baptiste, a Quebec organization).
NO EFFECTIVE COMMUNITY RESPONSE TO THE ISSUE
A few more incidents of young Hijabis expelled from school emerged. In some cases, parents of girls were interrogated by school administrators on whether they forced their daughters against their will to wear the Hijab.
A few school principals questioned the right of Muslim students to fast during the month of Ramadan.
The Muslim community found itself at the center of a debate for which it had no unifying voice.
Divisions within prevented any meaningful coalition of resources to address the pressing needs.
However, that did not stop individuals from taking action, including the parents of Dania Bali, a straight-A student who was asked to remove her Hijab. They filed a complaint with the Quebec Human Rights Commission.
A RULING THAT TURNED THE TIDE
As Ramadan arrived, the Commission made a landmark ruling that turned the tide: Quebec schools did not have the right to prohibit any student from wearing religious attire (be it a Sikh turban, a Jewish yarmulke, a Christian cross, or Islamic Hijab).
More importantly, Quebec society was asked to consider the issues of religious pluralism in the emerging “global village”.
The Quebec Charter of Rights guaranteed religious freedom, and no school administrator or employer could take that right away.
OTHER GROUPS ALSO SUPPORTED RIGHT TO WEAR HIJAB
In addition, the Quebec Council for the Status of Women and the Canadian Jewish Congress came out in favor of the Hijab – for different reasons.
For the Council, it was an issue of freedom of choice and access to education. If the Hijab were banned, the Council argued, many of these young Muslim girls would simply not attend school, and thus be penalized for their choice of belief.
For the Congress, it was an issue of religious rights for minorities.
COMMISSION ALSO RULED AGAINST A MUSLIM SCHOOL
It should be also noted that the Commission ruled against a Muslim school in Quebec that required non-Muslim teachers to wear the Hijab while teaching. One cannot force one's beliefs on others – be it for or against the Hijab.
Since that time, there have been fewer incidents of Hijab discrimination in the schools.
COMMUNITY HAS TO BE MORE PROACTIVE
However, the Muslim community must become more proactive in educating Quebec society about its beliefs and practices. It must also put aside differences for the common good of the community.
It must be ready to defend its rights by using the appropriate channels readily available.
Sheema Khan was a member of the Ottawa, Canada branch of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and was one of the few Muslim activists at the forefront in defending the right of Muslim girls to wear Hijab during the 1994-95 controversy in Quebec, Canada.
Comments
Faces covered for cultural and religious reasons
Ok so Canada is a free country, so why do the women who come here from places that force them to cover their entire body, still wear the clothing that oppresses them. Fine if you want to wear a head scarf that is great good for you, but to cover your entire face, that is just too much. If I walked into a store and wore a mask I would a) have the cops called on me or b) get kicked out of the store, you can't even wear glasses when you get your drivers license photo taken, but these women who wear full face coverings are allowed to do so, If I went the their country I would have to cover my entire body or be beat and probably killed, as I am a woman, but they are in our country now, you would think they would exercise their rights and not keep only their eyes exposed. It is not right, they should not be allowed to cover their entire face, it should be illegal, you can't identify them if something were to happen, and it is the men who probably make them do it, because they probably don't know their rights or even speak English for crying out loud, you are in Canada be free.
Location
Hijabs and gowns for female subs?
My sister, a Christian, has a teaching license for Alberta, and while subbing at the Calgary Islamic School, which is part of the Palliser group of schools-- it is not private as it says on their website-- (within the public school system of Alberta) she was told that she had to wear a hijab and gown to teach (like a choir gown to hide the figure). Is this legal that she must conform to Islamic beliefs within Canada? At the other Palliser schools, female subs are allowed to dress in smart-casual garb to work, and this is why I mention it.
Sincerely,
Margaret
Location
Canada is considered a free society. The very nature of covering your face or head to support and accept that you are a second class citizen is not a Canadian construct. If you want to be free to wear a badge of dishonor, Canada is not your stage. As far as I am concerned you can take your warped acceptance of being an inferior gender and shove it up your @ss. Islam by its very nature is a backwards ideology Canada does not want to be associated with. We don't want your kind mixing with our progressive culture that promotes freedom and equality.
Location
For some of you that say when you come to canada you have to adapt to our culture. ITS NOT CULTURE making muslim women wear the hijab its RELIGION. there is a strict distinction between the two! I think people can wear whatever they choose, thats the great part about Canada.
Location
religion
Sure covering your head maybe that is for religious reasons, but your entire face and body so no one can see your face, that is the men of the culture controlling the women, What if he beat his wife that night, no one could tell because you can't see her. If its a religious thing then why don't the men have to to it. If you want to function in society you have to be recognizable and having your entire body covered like a KKK member does not help you, it oppresses you. If I were to put on a KKK uniform and have the cap that covers your face on I would be hunted down, and shot. but what if I started a religion that had to wear that, really come on now, that is called extremest, do we really want to encourage that in Canada, I would hope not.
Location
I agree with the first poster. If you wish to come to Canada for whatever reason u should be prepared to adapt to our culture. I feel like we bend over backwards to accomadate everyone and end up stifling our own culture. Its give and take. We gave u a place to live now show a little respect for our culture as it seems to be working better than most places. I think in quebec they should teach canadian manners not just french to newcomers.
Location
religous rights
i f we are not allowed to pray in public or wear symbols why is it every time we see mr harper inthe house of commons ew see a man wearing a turban ....rcmp wearing a turban on duty..muslans should be oblidged to follow our custams and rules
Location
I think your story is good, however you fail to note that becoming part of Canada does not mean for us to adopt or be educated about these beliefs, it's for all immigrants to become one. It insults me that we as Canadians born and raised here are being forced to continuously change the rules and laws for others wishing to be a part of our great nation. Like the helmet law for instance. Why should those wearing their custom hair hats be except to wearing helmets and others not???? You need to show your article from both sides not just one. There is too much talk about changing what Canada means and has always meant, from changing our anthem to include it being sung in another language than the native language always used ENGLISH! Too many cultures are forgetting how Canada has welcomed them into our country after fleeing persecution, war, famine and other reasons to shelter and give them a new start. I love how diverse our great nation is but I despise that immigrants feel they are owed more respect for their mothering countries. If there is such a respect needed... then why on God's earth move to Canada?
Location
I think you wrote a great essay and i think everyone should wrtie one since some people still discriminate us women and girls against wearing hijab, which is not a bad thing but it is respectful and it does not give the masculin eye any negative thoughts
Location
masculin eye
if you can't walk down the street in pants and a top or coat but have to cover your face that is not on society that is on the in security of your husband or father. Women in the country's that make them wear face and body coverings get raped, and murdered (oh sorry)" honor killings" by their fathers and brothers, if they feel the woman has dishonored their family in some way, and the woman doesn't even get a trial. So the masculine eye's negative thoughts still happen if the man is evil, he is evil irregardless of what the woman is wearing.
Location
Add new comment